Legal Opinion

Solar Electric Co. v. Brookville Boro.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 17, 1930No. Appeals, 116 and 125PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Simpson,

The only difficulty on these two appeals grows out of the confused state of the record, the errors in which were contributed to by each of the parties. We will endeavor, in the light of this fact, to do equity between them in a single opinion.

Plaintiff, a corporation chartered to supply electric light, heat and power in the Borough of Brookville and vicinity, sought, by its bill in equity in this case, to prevent the borough and its officials from further interfering with its business. The court below granted plaintiff a preliminary injunction, from which…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Howard v. GoodnoughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  2. Transue v. GregorashczukSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Smith v. Glen Alden Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  2. Rich Hill Coal Company v. BashoreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Solar Electric Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Bowers v. ReitzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  5. New York Life Insurance v. SekulaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API