Legal Opinion

Roth v. Columbia Distributing Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 24, 1952No. Appeal, 186PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Jones,

The plaintiff, on April 3, 1952, filed in the court below his bill of complaint and an affidavit of immediate and irreparable loss or damage. The court, pursuant to Equity Rule 38, granted a preliminary injunction without notice to the defendants after the required security had been entered by the plaintiff and approved by the court. April 8, 1952, at 9:3Q A.M. was the time fixed for the hearing on a motion to continue the injunction. A copy of the bill and injunction were duly served on the defendants.

At the hearing on April 8th, counsel for both parties were…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Railroad v. DriscollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Trainer v. International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees, Local No. 516Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  3. Borough of Sunbury v. Sunbury & Susquehanna Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  4. Drum v. DinkelackerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  5. Baur v. Wilkes-Barre Light Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Safeguard Mutual Insurance v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Williams v. BridySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. Grosso v. EnglertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  4. City Line Open Hearth, Inc. v. Hotel, Motel & Club Employees' UnionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  5. Rupel v. BluesteinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API