Legal Opinion

Conrad v. Stahlman

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 26, 1929No. Appeal 8PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

This appeal is from an order dissolving a preliminary injunction apparently granted under Buie 38, since the record consists only of the bill and several injunction affidavits. A motion to dissolve made five days later, was granted in an opinion filed shortly thereafter. The purpose of the bill was to restrain, until the further order of the court, the sale of premises on a writ of levari facias in a mortgage foreclosure on the ground that by oral agreement the parties had agreed to subordinate the lien of the mortgage to that of a subsequent mortgage held by complainant. The court…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Holden v. LlewellynSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  2. Brackin v. Welton Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  3. Transue v. GregorashczukSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Basch & Strohl v. SchunkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API