Legal Opinion
State v. Poteat
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided April 20, 2004No. COA03-764PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ELMORE, Judge.
In this appeal we must determine whether the trial court erred by denying professional bail bondsman Tim Mathis’ (Mathis) motion to set aside forfeiture of an appearance bond Mathis posted on behalf of Jeffrey Craig Poteat (Poteat) for the purpose of securing Poteat’s appearance in court to answer charges of driving while license revoked and failure to appear. Because we conclude that the trial court correctly denied Mathis’ motion, we affirm the trial court’s order.
The underlying facts are as follows: on 29 August 1995, a North Carolina State Highway Patrol officer cited Poteat…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re WatsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. MabeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
- Jordan v. Central Piedmont Community CollegeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
- State v. . BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- State v. BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. DunnCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- Lujan v. New Mexico Department of TransportationNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2014
- Phillips v. North Carolina Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- State v. HinnantCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
- Doe v. Charlotte Mecklenburg Board of EducationDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2023
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.