Peerless Division, Lear Siegler, Inc. v. United States Special Hydraulic Cylinders Corp.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtWathen, C.J.
[¶ 1] United States Special Hydraulic Cylinders Corp. a/k/a Hunger Hydraulics (Hunger) appeals from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (Penobscot County, Delahanty, J.) in favor of Peerless Division, Lear Siegler, Inc. (Peerless) on its cross-claim seeking indemnification from Hunger. The judgment was rendered in the context of a personal injury action brought by Arthur Mann against Peerless and Hunger. On appeal, Hunger contends that the court erred in denying its motion for satisfaction of judgment, in finding that it was liable under an indemnity agreement, and in denying its request…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ziarko v. Soo Line RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
- Larson MacHine, Inc. v. WallaceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
- Vermeer Carolina's, Inc. v. Wood/Chuck Chipper Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
- Dongo v. BanksSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
- Cherry v. Tanda, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Howard & Bowie, P.A. v. CollinsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- LaFosse v. ChampagneSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- Estate of Dresser v. Maine Medical CenterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008