Estate of Dresser v. Maine Medical Center
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Dissent
MEAD, J., with whom LEVY and GORMAN, JJ.,
join, dissenting.
[¶ 11] I respectfully dissent. The Court’s decision today misses an opportunity to offer clarity to a complex and important area of the law and creates uncertainty and confusion instead. The parties have presented a straightforward question: Does Maine law require a tortfeasor who settles with the victim of the tort to obtain a liability release from the victim in favor of non-settling joint tortfeasors before commencing an action against them for contribution? The Court declines to answer this deeply consequential question, citing a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hobbs v. HurleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1918
- Otis Elevator Co. of Maine v. F.W. Cunningham & SonsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
- Thermos Co. v. SpenceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
- Peerless Division, Lear Siegler, Inc. v. United States Special Hydraulic Cylinders Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999