Legal Opinion

Eisenschmidt v. Conway

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 19, 1944No. 31339PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArnold, J.

Action by H. C. Eisenschmidt, as plaintiff, against R. M. Conway and Lawrence Mills, as defendants. From an order and judgment sustaining a motion of defendants for a directed verdict, plaintiff appeals.

Plaintiff’s petition in this case was based upon alleged fraud in the procurement from him by defendants of an assignment of a certain judgment held and owned by him, the facts leading up to this action being substantially as follows:

In 1926 John J. Black and wife executed three notes to the Exchange Trust Company, two of said notes being in the sum of $2,060 each and the third in the sum of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Solts v. Southwestern Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. Ziska v. ZiskaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  3. Harris v. Misssouri, K. & T. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  4. Shawnee Light & Power Co. v. SearsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  5. Edmisson v. Drumm-Flato Commission Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Horn v. MitchellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  2. Midwestern Acceptance Co. v. Allied Finance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API