Eisenschmidt v. Conway
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtArnold, J.
Action by H. C. Eisenschmidt, as plaintiff, against R. M. Conway and Lawrence Mills, as defendants. From an order and judgment sustaining a motion of defendants for a directed verdict, plaintiff appeals.
Plaintiff’s petition in this case was based upon alleged fraud in the procurement from him by defendants of an assignment of a certain judgment held and owned by him, the facts leading up to this action being substantially as follows:
In 1926 John J. Black and wife executed three notes to the Exchange Trust Company, two of said notes being in the sum of $2,060 each and the third in the sum of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Solts v. Southwestern Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Ziska v. ZiskaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Harris v. Misssouri, K. & T. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Shawnee Light & Power Co. v. SearsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Edmisson v. Drumm-Flato Commission Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Horn v. MitchellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
- Midwestern Acceptance Co. v. Allied Finance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963