Legal Opinion
Holliday v. Pickhardt
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
Decided January 29, 1887PublishedCited by 10 opinions
In Equity.
1Opinion of the CourtWallace, J.
This suit- is brought to restrain infringement of letters patent No. 250,247, dated November 29,1881, issued to John Holliday, assignor, etc., and also to vacate letters patent No. 250,201, of the same date, now owned by the defendants, issued to Heinrich Caro, assignor, etc. Both patents claim a chemical product as a new article of manufacture, and the process by which it is produced. The product claimed in each is a coloring matter having specified properties or characteristics, and the process claimed in each relates to the conversion of rosaniline into a sulpho-acid, which is capable of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Smith v. Goodyear Dental Vulcanite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Tilghman v. ProctorSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Philadelphia, Wilmington & Baltimore Railroad v. HowardSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
- Foster v. LindsayU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1875
- Wooster v. CalhounU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1873
3Cited by10 opinions
- Stoody Co. v. Mills Alloys, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
- Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. v. Union Carbide Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western New York · 1901
- Read Holliday & Sons, Ltd. v. Schulze-BergeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1896
- Root Spring Scraper Co. v. Willett Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1936
- Southern Electro-Chemical Co. v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1925
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.