Legal Opinion
Southern Electro-Chemical Co. v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided August 14, 1925PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BODINE, District Judge.
This suit charges the defendant with infringement of claims 1, 3, and 5 of United States letters patent to Harry Pauling, No. 1,031,864, granted July 9, 1912, for method of concentrating nitric acid', and assigned to and owned by the plaintiff. The bill prays an injunction and an accounting for profits and damages.
The bill of complaint was filed May 15, 1920, and defendant replied by answer filed October 20,1920, amended November 6,1922, further amended December 26, 1922, and again amended February 16, 1923. As defendant’s answer thus amended presented 171 patents and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Potts v. CreagerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Smith v. Goodyear Dental Vulcanite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Carnegie Steel Co. v. Cambria Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Cochrane v. DeenerSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Tolfree v. WetzlerDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1927
- Honey Bum, LLC v. Fashion Nova, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- (HC) Graves v. CiolliDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- Krause v. Yavapai, County ofDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021