Foster v. Lindsay
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
TREAT, District Judge.
This is a suit in equity under section 4918 of the Revised Statutes of the United States, concerning alleged interfering patents. The defendant’s patent [No. 149,5S9J was prior in date to plaintiff's; also the application therefor. The plaintiff claims that the invention was by him; that he had, previous to any knowledge thereof by the defendant, not only invented the patented composition, but actually reduced it to a practical and successful test; that he had shown to the defendant the manufactured article, and when, as their foreman in the brick business, he was…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Palmer Pneumatic Tire Co. v. LozierCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1898
- Electrical Accumulator Co. v. Brush Electric Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio · 1890
- Holliday v. PickhardtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1887
- Dittgen v. Racine Paper Goods Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Wisconsin · 1910
- Lockwood v. ClevelandUnited States Circuit Court · 1884
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.