Legal Opinion

Henriksen v. Cameron

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 24, 1993PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLLINS, Justice.

In this case, we are asked to decide whether a spouse, now divorced, may recover for emotional suffering intentionally inflicted by the former spouse during their marital relationship through physical violence and accompanying verbal abuse. A jury returned a verdict in favor of the injured plaintiff, Marie B. Henriksen, in her action for intentional infliction of emotional distress against her former husband, John Malcolm Cameron. Cameron appealed asserting two evidentiary challenges and raising the question whether Henriksen’s tort action is barred after the parties’ divorce…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Heacock v. HeacockMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
  2. Merenoff v. MerenoffSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
  3. Courtney v. CourtneyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Vicnire v. Ford Motor Credit Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  5. Gammon v. Osteopathic Hospital of Maine, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Twyman v. TwymanTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Feltmeier v. FeltmeierIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Xiao Yang Chen v. FischerNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Daniels v. Tew Mac Aero Services, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  5. State v. WhiteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API