Legal Opinion

Peer v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1938No. 26900PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGorman, J.

While the Court of Appeals in its journal entry, used the unfortunate term that there was no “credible evidence” to sustain the finding that Patrick Peer’s death was due to an injury sustained in the course of his employment, inasmuch as final judgment was entered in favor of the Industrial Commission, it is obvious that it found that reasonable minds could arrive at but one conclusion. See Boyd v. Royal Indemnity Co., 120 Ohio St., 515, 166 N. E., 580.

The ease was tried to the court without the intervention of a jury, but the test as to whether final judgment should have been entered in the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hamden Lodge No. 517 v. Ohio Fuel Gas Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Weaver v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Hubach v. ColeOhio Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Industrial Commission v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 1928
  5. E. Kahn's Sons Co. v. EllswickOhio Supreme Court · 1930

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Aiken v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  2. State v. HobbsOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Gillen-Crow Pharmacies, Inc. v. MandzakOhio Supreme Court · 1966
  4. In re MullenOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Depas v. Highland Local School District Board of Edn.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API