Legal Opinion

State v. Hobbs

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 2012No. 2011-1504 and 2011-1593PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCupp, J.

{¶ 1} For purposes of Crim.R. 4(A), may a person simultaneously hold the positions of deputy sheriff for a county and of deputy clerk for a municipal court located in that same county? Because the appellate court reached the proper conclusion in this matter, we affirm.

I. Factual and Procedural Background

{¶ 2} In 2009, three detectives of the Summit County Sheriffs Department visited appellant, Jillian D. Hobbs, at her home. The purpose of the visit was to ask appellant about a recent burglary in the neighborhood in which she had been implicated. Upon the detectives’ arrival, appellant invited…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. State v. BurnsideOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  5. United States v. CrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. State v. CastagnolaOhio Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State v. Hoffman (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  3. State v. Harrison (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021
  4. State v. HoppOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. State v. ShrewsburyOhio Court of Appeals · 2014

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API