State v. Hobbs
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCupp, J.
{¶ 1} For purposes of Crim.R. 4(A), may a person simultaneously hold the positions of deputy sheriff for a county and of deputy clerk for a municipal court located in that same county? Because the appellate court reached the proper conclusion in this matter, we affirm.
I. Factual and Procedural Background
{¶ 2} In 2009, three detectives of the Summit County Sheriffs Department visited appellant, Jillian D. Hobbs, at her home. The purpose of the visit was to ask appellant about a recent burglary in the neighborhood in which she had been implicated. Upon the detectives’ arrival, appellant invited…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- State v. BurnsideOhio Supreme Court · 2003
- United States v. CrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- State v. CastagnolaOhio Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. Hoffman (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. Harrison (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021
- State v. HoppOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- State v. ShrewsburyOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.