Russo v. Mountain High, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ERWIN, Judge.
Plaintiffs’ sole assignment of error is that the trial court erred in allowing the motion by defendants Warren and John Hancock for summary judgment. We do not agree and accordingly affirm the judgment of the trial court.
In arguing that the trial court committed error, plaintiffs rely heavily on the 2 July 1969 telephone call from Goldring and Fewell to defendant Warren. They assert that in the course of this conversation, Warren misrepresented the acreage when Warren was either aware of the true acreage or “recklessly ignorant” as to the true acreage.
Plaintiffs rely on Parker v.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ragsdale v. KennedySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Harding v. Southern Loan & InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Nytco Leasing, Inc. v. DAN-CLEVE CORPORATIONSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- Parker v. BennettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
3Cited by11 opinions
- Daniel Boone Complex, Inc. v. FurstCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- Ramsey v. Keever's Used CarsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- Whitlock v. Duke UniversityDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1986
- Berkeley Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Terra Del Sol, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- Briggs v. Mid-State Oil Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.