Briggs v. Mid-State Oil Co.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Judge.
The first issue this Court must deal with is whether plaintiffs’ appeal at this time is premature. Defendant asserts that it is premature because no substantial right of plaintiffs was affected, G.S. 1-277, because there was no judgment on all of the claims, and because the trial court did not enter a final judgment, as required by G.S. 1A-1, Rule 54(b), by determining that there is no just reason for delay. Because of the Supreme Court opinion in Oestreicher v. Stores, 290 N.C. 118, 225 S.E. 2d 797 (1976), we are compelled to reject defendant’s argument.
G.S. 1A-1, Rule 54(b)…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Oestreicher v. American National Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Still v. LanceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Best v. PerryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- Brice v. MooreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
- Moore v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Anderson v. Sara Lee Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
- Liggett Group, Inc. v. SunasCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- Harton v. HartonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Uzzell v. Integon Life Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Lewis v. City of WashingtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.