Legal Opinion
Bearingpoint, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided April 30, 2007No. 06-675CPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS
WHEELER, Judge.
This ease is before the Court on Plaintiff BearingPoint’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”). In its September 26, 2006 Complaint, BearingPoint requested a timely review under the Contract Disputes Act, 41 U.S.C. § 601 et seq., of two default terminations issued by a Department of Interior (“DOI”) Contracting Officer. BearingPoint now asserts in its motion to dismiss that the DOI lacked authority to issue such termination notices. The case…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Alder Terrace, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Call Henry, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Sharp Electronics Corporation v. ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Rogers v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- De Maio v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- K-Con Building Systems, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.