Legal Opinion
GTE Wireless, Inc. v. Qualcomm, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided February 14, 2002No. CIV. 99CV2173-B(CGA)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING GTE’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON INFRINGEMENT; GRANTING QUALCOMM’S MOTION ON SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NO INFRINGEMENT; DENYING ALL OTHER PENDING MOTIONS AS MOOT
BREWSTER, Senior District Judge.
The plaintiff, GTE, filed an action against Qualcomm, Inc., asserting the Qualcomm phones that incorporate the Preferred Roaming List software 1 infringed the 4,916,728 patent (“728 patent”). Qualcomm counterclaimed seeking a declaratory judgment that its phones do not infringe the patent.
GTE now moves for summary judgment asking the Court to hold that (1) the Qual-comm phones literally…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- E-Pass Technologies, Inc. v. 3 COM CORP.District Court, N.D. California · 2002
- Business Objects, S.A. v. Microstrategy, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2005