Legal Opinion

Business Objects, S.A. v. Microstrategy, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided July 26, 2005No. C 01-03908 CRBPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

BREYER, District Judge.

Plaintiff Business Objects, S.A. (“Business Objects”) and defendant Microstrate-gy, Inc. (“Microstrategy”) produce software products which allow users to query a relational database without learning the complex syntax of the query language. Business Objects brought this patent action against Microstrategy alleging that defendant’s products infringe U.S. Patent No. 5,555,403 (“the ’403 patent”) literally and under the doctrine of equivalents. Now before the Court is defendant’s post-remand motion for summary…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Keenan v. AllanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  5. Southwall Technologies, Inc. v. Cardinal Ig CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API