Legal Opinion

Pugnier v. Ramharter

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1957PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinle, J.

There is no bill of exceptions, hence under the rule we .are concerned only with the question as to whether the judgment is supported by the pleadings and the findings. Dovi v. Dovi (1944), 245 Wis. 50, 13 N. W. (2d) 585, 151 A. L. R. 1368.

A taxpayer may maintain an action in behalf of himself and other taxpayers to recover back into the public treasury funds illegally extracted therefrom. Milquet v. Van Straten (1925), 186 Wis. 303, 202 N. W. 670.

A town has only such powers as are conferred on it by statute or are necessarily implied therefrom. Milton Junction v. Milton (1953), 263 Wis. 367,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Frederick v. Douglas CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  2. State ex rel. Wisconsin Development Authority v. DammannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Amy v. WatertownSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  4. Dovi v. DoviWisconsin Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Willard v. ComstockWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Gutter v. SeamandelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Doe v. Archdiocese of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Clean Wisconsin, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Sprung Ex Rel. Sprung v. RasmussenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
  5. Fugina v. DonovanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API