Legal Opinion

Cincinnati Insurance v. Phillips

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1990No. 88-401PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.

Upon rehearing the cause before us, we believe that this court’s original decision in Cincinnati Ins. I was clearly erroneous and would, if not rectified, create much confusion in this difficult area of the law. Since we firmly believe that Ohio law as interpreted in our prior decision in Wood v. Shepard (1988), 38 Ohio St. 3d 86, 526 N.E. 2d 1089, demands that the wrongful death statutes (R.C. 2125.01 and 2125.02)2 not be abridged in any manner whatsoever, we reverse the decision of the court of appeals below.

The liability policy issued by appellee to the Phillipses provides in pertinent…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tomlinson v. SkolnikOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Wood v. ShepardOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Hill v. Allstate InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1990

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Clark v. ScarpelliOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Littrell v. WigglesworthOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Schaefer v. Allstate InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State Farm Automobile Insurance v. RoseOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Schaefer v. Allstate Ins. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API