Patton v. Royal Industries, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
SHINN, J. *
The action is for libel and slander, invasion of the right of privacy, interference with the right of contract and unfair competition conspiracy. Defendants were Royal Industries, Inc., and Edward C. Reed. In a jury trial the court granted a motion of defendants for a nonsuit upon the cause of action for invasion of privacy and denied motions of both parties for directed verdicts as to the other causes of action. The jury returned a verdict in favor of all defendants on all remaining causes of action. Plaintiffs made motions for summary judgment, which motions were denied.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- MacLeod v. Tribune Publishing Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
- Snively v. Record Publishing Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
- California Press Manufacturing Co. v. Stafford Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1923
- DiGiorgio Furit Corp. v. American Federation of Labor & Congress of Industrial OragnizationsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Schomberg v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Shirley C. Shehadeh v. Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Company of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- Sanchez-Corea v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Gail Davis v. Diana RossCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Scott v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1974
- Neumann v. BishopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.