Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Rosehill Burial Park

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 8, 1936No. 24924PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMeNEILL, C. J.

This is a suit for specific performance for a deed for a crypt in a mausoleum.

W. J. Thompson, plaintiff in error, on May 24, 1918, entered into an agreement with the Rosehill Burial Park wherein he subscribed for de luxe section ten (10) in the Rosehill Mausoleum to be erected in Rose-hill Burial Park in Oklahoma City. The consideration was $2,000, and at the time of final payment Thompson was to be issued a deed conveying in perpetuity the space subscribed for in said mausoleum. Plaintiff paid in cash $185, bonds in the sum of $564.15, and mining stock in the sum of $1,000. The mausoleum was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wilson v. BombeckSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Hurst v. HannahSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Woods v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pepper v. TruittCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
  2. Pickle v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  3. Johnston v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API