Legal Opinion

People v. Franklin

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 8, 1982No. 81SA285PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

QUINN, Justice.

In this interlocutory appeal the People challenge an order suppressing a gold watch 1 seized during the execution of a search warrant which did not include the watch as one of the articles to be seized. The district court suppressed the watch on the ground that the People failed to establish an adequate nexus between the watch and the specific criminal activity being investigated under the warrant. We conclude that the court applied an inappropriate standard in suppressing the evidence and, accordingly, we reverse and remand with directions.

I

The defendant is charged in a…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Stanley v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Commonwealth v. JacksonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. People v. Superior Court (Meyers)California Supreme Court · 1979

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. People v. ThiretSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  2. People v. HeartySupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  3. People v. RoarkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  4. People v. MelgosaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  5. People v. LewisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API