Legal Opinion

State v. Anderson

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1998No. 96-0087-CR, 96-0088-CRPublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliam A. Bablitch, J.

¶ 1. The State of Wisconsin (State) seeks review of a decision of the court of appeals1 which reversed convictions of Daniel Anderson (Anderson) for two counts of bail jumping, each count based on a violation of a separate condition of the same bond. Because we determine that the violations of the different conditions of bond are different in fact and there is no clear indication to rebut the presumption that the legislature intended multiple punishments, we hold that the two convictions are not multiplicitous. Accordingly, we reverse the decision of the court of appeals.

¶ 2. The facts…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. State v. RabeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Roy Irby v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  5. State v. KuntzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Quintano v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  2. State v. MultalerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. DavisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. TrawitzkiWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State v. HallWashington Supreme Court · 2010

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API