Legal Opinion
State v. Hall
Washington Supreme Court
Decided April 22, 2010No. 82558-1PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
230 P.3d 1048 (2010)
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Isiah Thomas HALL, Petitioner.
No. 82558-1.
Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
Argued January 26, 2010.
Decided April 22, 2010.
Jonathan Michael Palmer, Attorney at Law, Dana M. Lind, Nielsen Broman & Koch, P.L.L.C., Seattle, WA, for Petitioner.
Dennis John McCurdy, King County Prosecutor's Office, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.
CHAMBERS, J.
¶ 1 We are asked to determine the unit of prosecution for the crime of witness tampering when the defendant makes multiple phone calls to a single witness in an attempt to persuade that witness not to testify…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- In Re SnowSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- State v. AdelWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. VladovicWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. AdelWashington Supreme Court · 1998
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- State v. RobertsonUtah Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. BarbeeWashington Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. BoswellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- State v. VarsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- State v. ChouapCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.