Legal Opinion
Muhammed Abdullah v. U.S. Security Associates, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 27, 2013No. 11-55653PublishedCited by 146 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAEZ, Circuit Judge:
The district court certified a class of former and current employees of U.S. Security Associates, Inc. (“USSA”), who allege that USSA committed numerous violations of California labor law. USSA filed a petition to appeal the district court’s certification order, which we granted. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(f). On appeal, USSA argues that the court erred in certifying the meal break sub-class, because the plaintiffs failed to establish “questions of law or fact common to the class” that “predominate” over questions affecting only individual members. Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(a)(2),…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Comcast Corp. v. BehrendSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Amgen Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust FundsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. HinksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by146 opinions
- Victor Parsons v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Saravia v. SessionsDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2017
- Bacilio Ruiz Torres v. Mercer Canyons Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Sali ex rel. Themselves v. Corona Reg'l Med. Ctr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Just Film, Inc. v. Sam BuonoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
141 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.