Legal Opinion
Central Delta Water Agency v. United States Fish & Wildlife Service
District Court, E.D. California
Decided September 8, 2009No. 1:09-CV-00861 OWW DLBPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING MULTIPLE MOTIONS TO DISMISS (DOCS. 106, 107, 112, 113, 114, 116, 118), GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART WATER AGENCY DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STRIKE (DOC. 173), AND DENYING AS MOOT STATE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO QUASH SERVICE (DOC. 105).
OLIVER W. WANGER, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This case concerns the ongoing development and preliminary environmental review of the Bay Delta Conservation Plan (“BDCP”), a yet-to-be consummated collaborative approach to restoring the Saeramento-San Joaquin Delta ecosystem, while also protecting water supplies. See…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Spann v. J.C. Penney Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
- Daugherty v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
- Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations v. United States Department of the InteriorDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2013
- Lakes & Parks Alliance v. Federal Transit AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2015
- Lakes & Parks Alliance of Minneapolis v. Metropolitan CouncilDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.