Legal Opinion

Gordon v. Western Steel Co.

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided August 21, 1997No. 13-95-512-CVPublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

YANEZ, Justice.

This is an appeal from the granting of two summary judgments based on a ten-year statute of repose. Appellees, Western Steel Company (“Western”) and Braselton Construction Company (“Braselton”), were subcontractors hired by appellants, Robert Frank Gordon and Port Royal Development Corporation (“Gordon” and “Port Royal,” respectively). By two points of error, appellants challenge the trial court’s holding that substantial completion of a subcontractor’s share of a construction project is an improvement that will trigger the statute of repose. We affirm.

Gordon and Port…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Johnson v. City of Fort WorthTexas Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Wornick Co. v. CasasTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Trinity River Authority v. URS Consultants, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Hidalgo v. Surety Savings and Loan AssociationTexas Supreme Court · 1972

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Haynes v. City of Beaumont, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2000
  2. Methodist Healthcare System of San Antonio, Ltd., L.L.P., W.C. Schorlemer, M.D., and Robert Schorlemer, M.D. v. Emmalene RankinTexas Supreme Court · 2010
  3. AMS Const. Co., Inc. v. Warm Springs Rehabilitation Foundation, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002
  4. Robinson v. Budget Rent-A-Car Systems, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2001
  5. Gutierrez v. Elizondo, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2004

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API