Legal Opinion

People v. Wandell

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 26, 1990PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, and a new trial ordered.

Defendant argues that, in the absence of a knowing waiver, he was denied effective assistance of counsel due to his defense counsel’s concurrent representation of the prosecution’s primary witness on an unrelated civil matter (see, People v Gomberg, 38 NY2d 307; People v Macerola, 47 NY2d 257). Under the unique circumstances presented we conclude that there should be a reversal.

As a threshold, the principles of People v Gomberg (supra) and People v Macerola (supra) apply to the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. GombergNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. People v. MacerolaNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. People v. McDonaldNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. People v. LombardoNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. People v. MattisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1986

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. People v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. People v. OrtizNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. People v. CarncrossNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. King v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  5. People v. SolomonNew York Court of Appeals · 2012

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API