People v. Wandell
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, and a new trial ordered.
Defendant argues that, in the absence of a knowing waiver, he was denied effective assistance of counsel due to his defense counsel’s concurrent representation of the prosecution’s primary witness on an unrelated civil matter (see, People v Gomberg, 38 NY2d 307; People v Macerola, 47 NY2d 257). Under the unique circumstances presented we conclude that there should be a reversal.
As a threshold, the principles of People v Gomberg (supra) and People v Macerola (supra) apply to the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. GombergNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. MacerolaNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- People v. McDonaldNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. LombardoNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. MattisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
3Cited by41 opinions
- People v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
- People v. OrtizNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- People v. CarncrossNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
- King v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. SolomonNew York Court of Appeals · 2012
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.