Legal Opinion

People v. Mattison

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 5, 1986PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Kaye, J.

Absent inquiry by the court and consent by the defendant, an attorney may not represent a criminal defendant in a trial at which a star prosecution witness is a codefendant whose plea bargain — including the promise to testify against defendant — was negotiated by a partner in the same firm. In these circumstances defendant is denied his right to effective assistance of counsel.

The following factual recital is derived from the undisturbed findings made after a hearing held pursuant to CPL 440.10, as well as the hearing and trial records.

Defendant, Donald Mattison,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. People v. GombergNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Cardinale v. GolinelloNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. People v. MacerolaNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. People v. LombardoNew York Court of Appeals · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. People v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. People v. OrtizNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. People v. McDonaldNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. People v. BerroaNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. People v. RecuperoNew York Court of Appeals · 1988

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API