Legal Opinion
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,656 Arthur Golden and Gladys Golden v. Anthony Garafalo
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided May 5, 1982No. 694, Docket 81-7693PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RALPH K. WINTER, Jr., Circuit Judge:
This appeal raises another of the recurrent and troubling questions1 as to the legal status of certain instruments under the Securities Act of 1933 (the “ ’33 Act”) and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “ ’34 Act”) (collectively, the “Acts”).
Plaintiffs purchased 100% of the outstanding stock of a corporation engaged in the ticket brokerage business from defendant, the sole stockholder. Plaintiffs intended to manage the business directly. The corporation presumably had the customary assets, owned the corporate name, and had non-assignable leasehold…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Superintendent of Insurance of New York v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United Housing Foundation, Inc. v. FormanSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Tcherepnin v. KnightSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. DanielSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Landreth Timber Co. v. LandrethSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Chemical Bank v. Arthur Andersen & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,667 Reprosystem, B v. and N. Norman Muller, and Cross-Appellants v. Scm Corporation, and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Yoder v. Orthomolecular Nutrition Institute, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Fund of Funds, Ltd. v. Arthur Andersen & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1982
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.