Ramage v. State
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
John Mauzy Pittman, Judge.
The appellant, Hubert Ramage, was charged with possession of a controlled substance (cocaine) with intent to deliver. His pretrial motion to suppress evidence was denied. He then entered a conditional plea of guilty pursuant to Ark. R. Crim. P. 24.3(b). On appeal, he contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress. We affirm.
Officer Michael Coleman of the Pine Bluff Police Department testified that, at approximately 1:00 a.m. on July 10, 1996, he stopped the vehicle that appellant was driving because the license plate was not illuminated as…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. SalvucciSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Davasher v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Embry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
- Stokes v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
- Fouse v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
- Wigley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
- Richard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.