Legal Opinion

Richard v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided December 9, 1998No. CA CR 97-854PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

D. Franklin Arey, III, Judge.

The appellant, Carl E. Richard, entered a conditional plea of guilty to a charge of possession of a controlled substance. The Lonoke County Circuit Court suspended imposition of a sentence for five years, placed appellant on probation for three years, and fined appellant $2,000. On appeal, appellant argues that the police made a warrantless entry into his cousin’s home without exigent circumstances, so that the evidence gained from their entry should have been suppressed. Because appellant failed to establish his standing to raise this Fourth Amendment challenge,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Marshall v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  3. McCoy v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  4. Rankin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997
  5. Ramage v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fouse v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
  2. Wigley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
  3. Starks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
  4. Miller v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
  5. Whitham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API