Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

State v. Matthew A. Lonkoski

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 2013No. 2010AP002809-CRPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtN. Patrick Crooks, J.

¶ 1. This is a review of an unpublished decision of the court of appeals that affirmed the judgment of conviction entered by the circuit court for Oneida County the Honorable Mark Manger-son presiding.

¶ 2. At issue in this case is the admissibility of statements made to detectives in an interrogation. The threshold question is whether Matthew A. Lonkoskiwas in police custody for purposes of Miranda 2 when he stated that he wanted an attorney. Within moments of stating he wanted a lawyer, Lonkoski clearly retracted his statement and thereafter repeatedly and emphatically stated that he wanted…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Yarborough v. AlvaradoSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. Danny Robert AlexanderWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State v. Brian L. HalversonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2021
  3. State v. Timothy E. DobbsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2020
  4. State v. Andrew M. EdlerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
  5. State v. QuigleyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2016

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API