Legal Opinion

State v. Andrew M. Edler

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 2013No. 2011AP002916-CRPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtN. Patrick Crooks, J.

¶ 1. This is a review of *4the circuit court's order granting Andrew M. Edler's motion to suppress statements he made during a custodial interrogation. We affirm the order of the circuit court. The statements Edler made after he invoked his right to counsel on April 20, 2011, must be suppressed. We remand to the circuit court for further proceedings consistent with this decision.

¶ 2. The court of appeals for District II certified the appeal pursuant to Wis. Stat. § (Rule) 809.61,1 and we accepted the certification.2

¶ 3. To answer the certified questions, we must decide whether statements made…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Dickerson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. McNeil v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. Derik J. WantlandWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State v. Brian L. HalversonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2021
  3. State v. Andrew M. EdlerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
  4. State v. Daniel J. H. BarteltWisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
  5. State v. Daniel J. H. BarteltWisconsin Supreme Court · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API