Legal Opinion
Haleston Drug Stores, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board. Smith v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 15, 1951No. 12446_1PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEALY, Circuit Judge.
These are proceedings to review orders of the National Labor Relations Board. The point in controversy is whether the Board, notwithstanding the existence of jurisdiction, has discretionary authority to dismiss unfair labor practice complaints on policy grounds.
The petitioner in No. 12,446 does business as A-l Photo Service in San Pedro, California, In April, 1948, he filed with the regional office of the Board a charge alleging that a local union of the A. F. of L. and certain of its agents were engaged in unfair labor practices affecting commerce. The general counsel of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Amalgamated Utility Workers v. Consolidated Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- National Labor Relations Board v. Indiana & Michigan Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
3Cited by43 opinions
- Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- National Labor Relations Board v. Guy F. Atkinson Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- SW General, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- The Frito Company, Western Division v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. Retail Clerks Union Local 770Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Katz v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.