Legal Opinion

Cary v. City of Pekin

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1878PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Writ of Error to the Circuit Court of Tazewell county; the Hon. John Burns, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scott

Complainants allege, they are the owners of farm lands situated within the corporate limits of the city of Pekin, as the boundaries of that city were established by the act of 1859, and that no portion of such lands have ever been laid off into town lots or blocks as part of the city, nor have they ever received any benefit from any public improvements carried on by the corporation, and that such lands lie a considerable distance from the improved portion of the city, and are only available and valuable for agricultural purposes. The object of the bill is, to enjoin the corporate authorities…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Vestal v. Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
  2. Kimball v. Grantsville CityUtah Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Mendenhall v. BurtonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
  4. Ferguson v. City of SnohomishWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Parrish v. City of RussellvilleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API