Legal Opinion

Oakland County Prosecutor v. Beckwith

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 16, 2000No. Docket 213447PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, P.J.

This case is before us pursuant to a Supreme Court order remanding the case for consideration as on leave granted. See 458 Mich 867 (1998). On appeal, plaintiff challenges the trial court’s order directing the Oakland County Prosecutor to pay a portion of a special master’s fees, specifically $698.70 for services rendered. We agree with plaintiff that Carson Fischer Potts & Hyman v Hyman, 220 Mich App 116, 119-121; 559 NW2d 54 (1996), is controlling and compels reversal of the trial court’s order directing the prosecutor to pay a portion of the special master’s fees. However, we follow the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Rockwell v. Crestwood School District Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Kern v. Blethen-ColuniMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. People v. SierbMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Durant v. State Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Durant v. State of MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Neal v. JamesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Caudill v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTO. INS. CO.Michigan Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Mark Cooper v. Raymond D ComerMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. Oakland County Prosecutor v. BeckwithMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API