Legal Opinion

Neal v. James

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 24, 2002No. Docket 226352PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendants, who include supervisors and the appointed corporation counsel for the city of Detroit’s legal department, appeal by leave granted the trial court’s order granting plaintiffs’ motion to certify a class composed of all African-American individuals who either held or sought employment with the city of Detroit’s law department from 1994 to 1999, for positions that required a law school education, including law clerks, legal interns, and lawyers. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

At issue in this case is whether the trial court erred in certifying a class action for legal…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Robert D. Sprague, Plaintiffs-Appellees/cross-Appellants v. General Motors Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  2. Jackson v. Motel 6 Multipurpose, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  3. Zine v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Sprague v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Carson Fischer Potts and Hyman v. HymanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Henry v. Dow Chemical Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Hill v. City of WarrenMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. A & M SUPPLY CO. v. Microsoft Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Duncan v. StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Tinman v. Blue Cross and Blue ShieldMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API