Legal Opinion
Ex Parte McInnis
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided November 2, 2001No. 1990045 and 1990659PublishedCited by 107 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
Petitioners-defendants Sam McInnis, Michael Borka, and Tim Shingleton petition this Court for a writ of mandamus to direct the trial judge to vacate her order denying these defendants' Rule 12(b)(2), Ala.R.Civ.P., motions to dismiss for want of personal jurisdiction and to direct her to enter an order granting these motions. We deny mandamus relief to the defendants McInnis and Shingleton but grant mandamus relief to the defendant Borka.
Anticipating the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by107 opinions
- Ex Parte Troutman Sanders, LLPSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- Ex Parte Covington Pike Dodge, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2004
- Ex Parte City of TuskegeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
- Wenger Tree Service v. Royal Truck & Equip., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2002
- Ex Parte Dill, Dill, Carr, Stonbraker & Hutchings, PCSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.