Legal Opinion

Nelson v. Pollay

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 20, 1996No. 80299PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OP ALA, Judge.

This public-law controversy presents three questions: (1) Does the 1985 Governmental Tort Claims Act [GTCA or Act] 1 shield faculty physicians — who are teaching in a medical education program at OHahoma Memorial Hospital [OMH or hospital] — from tort liability to a patient for negligence in providing medical or surgical services? (2) Does the 1985 version of the GTCA allow OMH to be answerable in tort (dehors the respondeat superior doctrine) — in a manner coextensive with the standards of liability that govern private hospitals — for the negligence of non-employee-physieians…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. PorterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  2. Vanderpool v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  3. Bartlett v. American National Bank & Trust Co. of SapulpaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  4. Dyke v. Saint Francis Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  5. Toxic Waste Impact Group, Inc. v. LeavittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Russell v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  2. Salazar v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  3. SMITH v. CITY OF STILLWATERSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
  4. Martin v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  5. Sides v. John Cordes, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API