Legal Opinion
Luce v. Brown
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided October 6, 1922PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMiles, J.
This is an action of replevin for a black mare. The case was tried before a referee, upon whose report judgment was rendered for the defendant for the return of the property and for the defendant to recover his costs, to which the plaintiff excepted. The hearing having been by a referee and his report having been accepted by the court, the findings are conclusive of the facts in issue, and no inference can be drawn in aid thereof. G. L. 2072; Kimball v. Baxter, 27 Vt. 628; Fuller v. Adams, 44 Vt. 543; Darby v. National Bank, 57 Vt. 370; Goff v. Brainard, 58 Vt. 468, 5 Atl. 393.
The controlling…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. O'NeilSupreme Court of Vermont · 1885
- Sowles v. CarrSupreme Court of Vermont · 1897
- Kitson Machine Co. v. HoldenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1902
- Singer Manufacturing Co. v. NashSupreme Court of Vermont · 1898
- Kimball v. Estate of BaxterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1854
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Weyerhaeuser Timber Co. v. First National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1934
- Gaylord v. HoarSupreme Court of Vermont · 1960
- Ravine House Co., Inc. v. BradstreetSupreme Court of Vermont · 1930
- Bresette v. BresetteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1972