Legal Opinion

Charles R. Pollard, Jr., D. B. A. Lytron Distributing Company, and Plastoid Corporation v. American Phenolic Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided February 15, 1955No. 6848_1PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOBIE, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a decision of the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, 122 F.Supp. 172, holding valid and infringed a patent for a high-frequency transmission cable owned by American Phenolic Corporation (hereinafter called Phenolic). Two questions are raised on this appeal: (1) is the patent in suit valid? and (2) if valid, is it infringed by Plastoid’s product? We hold that the patent is invalid, and, since this is sufficient ground for reversal, we need not consider the question of infringement.

The patent in suit, No. 2,543,696 (hereinafter…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. O'LEARY v. Liggett Drug Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1945
  3. Interstate Rubber Products Corp. v. Radiator Specialty Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1954
  4. Doughnut MacH. Corporation v. Joe-Lowe CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1933
  5. Kay Patents Corp. v. Martin Supply Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1953

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Gunter & Cooke, Inc. v. Southern Electric Service Co.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1966
  2. B. F. Goodrich Co. v. United States Rubber Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1956
  3. Hanks v. RossDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1961
  4. Waterproof Insulation Corp. v. Insulating Concrete Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1957
  5. Collins v. KraftDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1956

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API