Legal Opinion
Packwood v. Briggs & Stratton Corp.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided August 10, 1951No. Civ. A. 1307PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEAHY, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff sued for infringement Briggs & Stratton Corporation, an engine manufacturer, and Savage Arms Corporation, a manufacturer of power lawn mowers, upon claims 1, 2, 3 and 4 of reissue patent No. 23,146. The case was tried by jury. They returned a verdict of validity, infringement and awarded damages. . Defendants now move, under F.R. 50(b) 1 to have the verdict and judgment set aside and to have judgment in defendants’ favor in accordance with their former motion, made at trial (which was denied), for a directed verdict; or, in the alternative, for, under F.R. 59(a),…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Tennant v. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Jungersen v. Ostby & Barton Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Robertson Rock Bit Co. v. Hughes Tool Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1949
- Wabash Corp. v. Ross Electric Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Swofford v. B & W, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
- Artmoore Co. v. Dayless Mfg. Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954
- Anderson Company v. Sears, Roebuck and Co., and Zaiger CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1959
- Continental Can Company, Inc., (Appellee) v. Anchor Hocking Glass Corporation, (Appellant)Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1966
- Florida Brace Corporation and Arthur R. Moore v. William L. Bartels and Prosthetic & Orthopedic Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.