Legal Opinion

MPE Business Forms, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided July 29, 1999No. 97-100 CPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAMICH, Judge.

This case is before the Court based on cross motions for summary judgment based on the administrative record and review of a decision in MPE Business Forms, Inc., GPO BCA 10-95 (Aug. 16, 1996) [hereinafter “Decision”]. The case concerns the definition of the term “copy,” in context of a contract that provides for payment per “copy.” For example, when a form comprised of three sheets is reproduced, should the printer be paid for one copy or three copies?

FACTS

The facts are straightforward and relatively easy to understand. The Plaintiff, MPE Business Forms, Inc. (“MPE”),…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Gould, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
  2. Hercules, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Trauma Service Group v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
  4. Hol-Gar Manufacturing Corp. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  5. Fortec Constructors v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
  2. Bailey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
  3. Deponte Investments, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
  4. Colonial Press International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  5. Colonial Press International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API