Legal Opinion

Manry v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 6, 1948No. 31994PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Townsend,. J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) On the same date the defendant was indicted for both accessory before the fact and accessory after the fact in separate indictments. She was first tried and acquitted of accessory before the fact, and then the case against her for accessory after the fact was sounded. Before pleading to the merits she filed a plea in abatement to the latter indictment, in which she alleged these facts and prayed that the indictment be quashed. On motion of the solicitor-general this, plea was stricken. Exceptions pendente lite were duly preserved to this…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  2. Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  3. Cantrell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  4. Loeb v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  5. Ford v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Colosacco v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
  2. Moore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
  3. Heard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API