Heard v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) There is no merit in the motion to quash the accusation on the ground that it vías defective in not alleging the abandonment of a “minor” child. The accusation was drawn in the words of Code § 74-9902, which states, “If any father shall wilfully and voluntarily abandon his child, leaving it in a dependent condition, he shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.”
Every indictment or accusation which states the offense in the-language of the Code, or plainly enough that the offense may be easily understood by the jury, is sufficient. See Code, § 27-701; Ramer v.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Daniels v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
- United Motor Freight Terminals v. DriverCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
- Ramer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
- Johnson v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- South v. MontoyaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- Smith v. the Morning News, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
- Colonial Pipeline Co. v. Westlake Club, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- Hunt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
- Moody v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978