Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Ford v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 25, 1926No. 5153PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHines, J.

If any person shall buy or receive any goods which have been stolen or feloniously taken from another, knowing the same to be stolen or feloniously taken, such person shall be an accessory after the fact, and shall receive the same punishment as would be inflicted on the person convicted of having stolen or feloniously taken the property. Penal Code, § 168. If the principal thief can not be taken, so .as to be prosecuted and convicted, the person buying or receiving the goods stolen or feloniously taken by such principal thief, knowing the same to be stolen or feloniously taken, shall be…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Rawlins v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Studstill v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1849
  3. Cantrell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  4. Springer v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  5. Coxwell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1881

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  2. Moore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
  3. Bird v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1945
  4. McCrary v. the StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
  5. Carter v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API