Legal Opinion

Becker v. Beldt

California Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1928No. Docket No. L.A. 9557PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

The question of the sufficiency of the evidence to support the findings and judgment presents the sole issue for our determination. The appeal is by the interveners from judgment for plaintiffs in an action to recover upon a promissory note secured by a second chattel mortgage on furniture in a court dwelling-house. Both note and mortgage were executed by defendants L. B. Beldt and Rena B. Beldt, and were assigned to plaintiffs by the original mortgagee. Subsequently said defendants sold their lease and said furniture to defendant B. H. Truitt, subject to existing encumbrances, and he assumed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brown v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Gray v. BrunoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Bank of South San Francisco v. PikeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  4. Hemenway v. ThaxterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Roberts v. BuckinghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hibernia Savings & Loan Society v. DeRyanaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API