Netzel v. State Sand & Gravel Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.
This appeal asks two questions: Does this record justify the jury verdict finding the appellant negligent at all? Does it support a jury verdict finding the respondent entirely free from negligence? This court answers the first question in the affirmative, the second in the negative.
On the issue of the negligence of the cement-furnishing company, this case was tried and submitted to the jury under the doctrine of strict liability. The strict liability rule requires that the plaintiff must prove that the product was in defective condition when it left the possession or control of the seller;…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Dippel v. ScianoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Cramer v. Theda Clark Memorial HospitalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Delaney v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- City of Cedarburg Light & Water Commission v. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Neider v. SpoehrWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Suter v. San Angelo Foundry & MacHine CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
- FFE Transportation Services, Inc. v. FulghamTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- Weiss v. United Fire & Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
- Sumnicht v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- Greiten v. La DowWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.